Triumph Foods in Buchanan County Missouri implemented company-wide coronavirus testing of their employees, all of whom had no symptoms of infectious disease. The diagnostic test requires the use of an invasive swab that is inserted deep inside each person’s nasal canal. At the moment they were swabbed, a total of 373 employees tested positive for coronavirus RNA. The results have been coming in over the past few days. This number represents 17 percent of the workforce. According to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), none of the employees had symptoms of an infection.

Triumph Foods is one of out of dozens of meat packing plants and food processing facilities that have reported multiple cases of coronavirus RNA detection. CNN refers to these as “outbreaks” - calling for more surveillance and isolation of symptom-less people and their contacts. These “outbreaks” of asymptomatic detection are prompting food processing plants to close around the country. Because of the closures, the increasing amount of isolated workers, and the lucrative unemployment packages that keep workers at home, the food supply is at risk in America and around the world.

Governments to employ large armies of "contact tracers" as the food supply and human freedom are threatened

The United States is testing more people for coronavirus RNA than any other Nation. Strange enough, people with actual symptoms of an infection are regularly testing negative for coronavirus RNA. On average, ninety percent or more of people with respiratory symptoms are testing positive - not for COVID-19 - but for other respiratory viruses, that for some reason, are not of concern.

What the public health agencies are currently concerned about is calculating and tracking the number of symptom-less healthy people who contain traces of coronavirus RNA in their nose. These “asymptomatic” cases are now being documented as "outbreaks" at prisons and at food processing plants, leading to plant closures and early inmate releases.

In the quest to control the virus and eradicate its presence from the Earth, governments have decided to release prisoners onto the streets, while tracing, tracking, and isolating anyone who has no symptoms, who may have come into contact with someone who also has no symptoms of illness. This tracking effort includes employing hundreds of thousands of “contact tracers” across the United States. These contact tracers are beginning to interview people who test positive so they can track down all their contacts over a fourteen day period.

Dr. Randall Williams, director of Missouri's Department of Health and Senior Services, told CNN, “We continue to work this weekend contacting these asymptomatic patients and have initiated the process of contact tracing with those determined to be close contacts of our positive cases.” DHSS is urging anyone who has been in contact with an asymptomatic positive case to submit to their doctor for testing.

Contact tracers retrieve geolocation data from a target’s phone so they can better track down the people they came into contact with. Contact tracers then locate and confront these contacts at their place of business, work or home. These people are then told to take a swab and diagnostic test and to isolate for fourteen days.

In some states, governments are announcing plans for people to leave their homes and their families, so they can be relocated to a new quarantine location. This plan, to be employed in states like California, New York, and Illinois is based off the World Health Organization’s recommendation to come into homes and remove people who could have been exposed to the virus.

On March 30, Dr. Michael Ryan, Executive Director at the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, said, "In most parts of the world, due to lock down, most of the transmission that's actually happening in many countries now is happening in the household, at family level. In some senses, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units, now we need to go and look in families and find those people who may be sick and remove them, and isolate them, in a safe and dignified manner".

Is tracking and isolating people and shutting down the economy over "asymptomatic" cases really worth it?

Are asymptomatic cases really as dangerous as they are made out to be? Why are governments so concerned about tracking people down, while little is done to assist the immune systems of the most vulnerable? Moreover, what percent of these cases are false positives? Are these "abundance of caution" safety measures, tracking efforts, and plant-wide shutdowns worth it, when the food supply, the U.S. economy, and human dignity hangs in the balance? Which is worse for the food companies - being sued for not removing asymptomatic workers or contributing to the food shortages?

Do private companies have the right to treat workers and customers as medical slaves who must be swabbed and tested every day, tracked, controlled, monitored, privacy trampled, and mandated to submit to bodily requirements? Do individual rights matter anymore?

Sources include:
US.CNN.com
RealClearPolitics.com
SavedMag.com
LivePureBodyCare.com
YouTube.com

Scientists have been sounding the alarm about the dangers of 5th generation wireless technology. Some countries have heeded the warning about wireless radiation and the harmful effects of EMFs. China, on the other hand, has completely ignored all warnings and has proceeded to unleash 5G faster than any other nation. In fact, China rolled out 5G in the province of Wuhan in October 2019. Just two months later, the city became afflicted by a new kind of coronavirus named CoVid-19. How did a formerly benign class of virus become so opportunistic in such a short amount of time? Why is the death rate so high at the epicenter of the outbreak?

Did the 5G launch in Wuhan China cause widespread compromised immune systems?

Why did the city’s population suddenly become so vulnerable?

Could it be that 5G oxidized important surveillance proteins of the innate immune system of the Wuhan population? Does 5G cause severe inflammation, damaging the innate immune system? Could it be that 5G does cause DNA breaks, as documented by scientists? Do these DNA breaks potentially affect innate immune molecules such as the mannose binding lectins (MBLs), which are primarily located on lung surfactant proteins A and D?

MBLs are powerful defense molecules that have been clinically studied to target coronaviruses early in their replication cycle, preventing viral attachment. If MBL levels are compromised through oxidation, respiratory viruses can more readily take hold of the human host. Deficiency in MBLs also occurs when there is a three single point mutation in exon 1 of the MBL-2 gene. For an infectious agent to cause complication and/or fatality, a person’s immune system must be compromised. Did the launch of 5G in Wuhan China help facilitate the outbreak of this deadly bioweapon?

MBLs are a natural defense system in the human body used for biological recognition and surveillance at the molecular level. MBLs bind with sugars, allowing the protein to interact with many different kinds of viruses, bacteria, yeasts, fungi and protozoa cloaked with such sugars. MBLs are unique because they can bind to the surface of microbes and activate the complement system in an antibody. They are one of the only anti-viral systems that can break down the signature glycoprotein shell that surrounds coronaviruses, including Ebola, SARS, and MERS.

Deficiency in mannose binding lectins is linked to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neonatal sepsis, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), among other complications and respiratory illnesses. Scientists estimate that 10 to 30 percent of the population is deficient in MBLs, putting them at serious risk of complications from any and all respiratory infections. This is the most serious aspect of the coronavirus outbreak: Up to thirty percent of the population may already be susceptible to serious complications from this weaponized strain. 5G wireless radiation only compromises immunity further. After all, one of the documented symptoms of 5G is “flu-like symptoms.” Why is the fatality rate higher at the epicenter of the outbreak?

Did the launch of 5G wireless radiation cause oxidative damage to innate immune molecules like the mannose binding lectins in the people of Wuhan China? Did 5G cause genetic mutations, suppressing natural levels of mannose binding lectins? Did the well documented oxidative effects of 5G affect the population’s innate immune system, oxidizing the very molecules that the immune system needs in order to protect the respiratory system? Is 5G accelerating the virility of coronavirus by weakening important cellular surveillance systems on the proteins of lung cells?

Sources include:
WakingTimes.com
JRSeco.com
SMombiegate.org
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov
ScienceDirect.com
NaturalNews.com
Academic.oup.com
Journals.Plus.org
ScienceDirect.com
Link.Springer.com
DovePress.com

A traditional quarantine is intended to isolate a person who has been veritably exposed to an infectious disease and has symptoms of the infection. A properly-conducted quarantine can reduce the spread of a new virus that has multiplied in the cells of a host body and is likely to spread into the immediate environment via the cough and sneeze of the host body’s aerosols. With COVID-19, loose and inconsistent "quarantines" are being forced on most of the population, with no verification that COVID-19 is present. Even worse, discriminatory lock down and restrictions to personal liberty remain, even as 90 percent or more sick individuals test negative for COVID-19, and most who do test positive, ultimately recover with newfound immunity. Moreover, the study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms turns out to be flawed.

COVID-19 is a real threat but the American response lacks precision and has betrayed the terrain theory of disease, weakening the population long term

When scientists sequenced a new strain of coronavirus, and after preliminary studies from Wuhan, China estimated it had an R naught value between 5 and 6 (very contagious), most government and public health officials came to the consensus that statewide lock downs, the shuttering of select businesses, and stay-at-home orders were the best way to slow the spread of the new virus. In the process, individual liberty was sacrificed and a chain reaction of new problems were realized.

Because one person with COVID-19 symptoms can potentially transmit the coronavirus to 5 or 6 people in close proximity, health officials assumed that everyone would rapidly become infected and require hospitalization, causing overcrowded health systems and a lack of medical treatments. Based on data from Wuhan China, most states in the US went into lock down mode.

Not only were rights suspended during this time, but the authoritarian approach also lacked precision and consistency. Governors determined some activities to be essential – like getting alcohol, eating fast food, and crowding Wal-Mart, while other activities were deemed non-essential - such as spreading out at state parks, buying seeds, playing on park playgrounds, or getting sun at the beach (even though vitamin D deficiency is linked to worse outcomes).

The discriminatory shutdown approach lacked precision and did not accurately determine infection or exposure to infection to conduct evidence-based quarantines of people with COVID-19. Now, many people are beginning to wonder whether this inconsistent and controlling lock down approach was worth it, especially as businesses, employment, mental health, individual rights, and personal livelihoods hang in the balance. Why do we allow a hypothetical chain of infection to occur at "essential" places, but  small businesses, gyms, playgrounds, beaches, and state parks remain shuttered and controlled?

As a society, have we taken the wrong approach to facing and overcoming infectious disease and will we succumb to government tyranny, which is far more dangerous?

Even though nothing was said or done to help the population mount a healthy immune response to the new virus, everyone was assumed to be infected and assumed to require hospitalization. This assumption was shortsighted, as many people who test positive might be false positive, do not exhibit symptoms at all, and may only experience mild illness. As a matter of fact, in most every state, over 90 percent of people who take the PCR test, test negative for COVID-19 and positive for other respiratory illnesses.

Still, there are some people with underlying chronic conditions, immune-deficiencies, etc. who are at greater risk of complications and death from COVID-19, or any respiratory viral infection. Most complications in NYC came from obese patients. Erroneously, restricting the movement, assembly, economic activity, and leisure of all people became the “cure” for sick individuals with underlying conditions and immune-deficiencies.

During the panic, severe cases of illness were not differentiated from mild ones, and the range of symptoms to determine COVID-19 became so broad and undefined, that healthcare professionals started listing “assumed” or “suspected” cases of COVID-19 as the provisional cause of death for many patients who had co-infections, comorbidity, or underlying health conditions that were the cause of hospitalization in the first place.

The World Health Organization and National Vital Statistics officially advised health care professionals to "assume" COVID-19 cases, without confirmation. New York City’s COVID-19 death tally soared by more than 3,700 when it included the  deaths of people who were suspected of having COVID-19 but were never tested. Although there is financial incentive for placing patients on ventilators, many NYC doctors report that patients are suffering from further lung damage on the machines, and they observe an 80 percent fatality rate once these devices are used. This is compounded by the fact that ventilator-associated pneumonia affects upwards of 300,000 Americans each year and could be a determining factor in mortality.

In the end, fearing asymptomatic spread from all healthy human beings may prove to be a futile approach that forces everyone to live in perpetual and irrational paranoia. The longer we fear our environment and ignore what we can do to help our individual immune systems recover, the longer it takes for the population to develop herd immunity. We will never completely control the life cycle of pathogens in a population, no matter how much we shutter people’s lives, oppress them, depress them, and plunge them into economic calamity. We must focus on strengthening the immune response of all, especially the most vulnerable, or we will be consumed by fear and perish as a nation.

Furthermore, when lock downs are lifted, people who have been stagnant in their homes, lost their jobs, stuck drinking alcohol and eating essential fast food, will become even more susceptible to infections in the coming year. Left ignorant of what they can do to overcome infections, trapped on a nutrient-void diet, and slowly dying from immune-suppressant drugs, the modern American’s cellular terrain will present a conducive environment for viruses to take hold and multiply.

The terrain theory of disease was completely ignored during this pandemic and as a result, herd immunity will be realized slowly and painfully over time, as people with weak immune systems continue to suffer, leading to further outbreaks, more complications, and a higher death rate to COVID-19 and a host of other respiratory infections that claim millions of lives each year.

Sources include:
ScienceMag.org
Patch.com
BusinessInsider.com
ResearchSquare.com
Forbes.com
ARSTechnica.com
Politico.com
NaturalNews.com
CDC.gov
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov
WHO.int [Page 8]